Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Thursday, May 24, 2012
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Click on the link: End Fossil Fuel Subsidies, and sign the petition. I just did :)
Do not be a fusspot and say that online petitions do not actually have an impact.
They do.
photo-credits: http://priceofoil.org/2009/09/16/money-for-nothing-and-your-climate-for-free/
Do not be a fusspot and say that online petitions do not actually have an impact.
They do.
On November 1, Change.org announced their victory over Bank of America’s $5 debit card fee after over 300,000 people signed a (online) petition asking the bank to eliminate the fee for all customers. The petition was created by an independent member of Change.org who also broadcasted her plea onto Facebook and Twitter. Dominitz says that Change.org depends on social networking sites so that people can use their connections to spread word of their cause with immediacy. He believes that online petitioning is a tool that goes hand in hand with why people reach out to one another online on sites like Facebook. “It’s looking for something that is larger than ourselves—making or signing a petition gives you a sense of being part of your world.”
Source: www.genyu.net
So yes. They have worked.
photo-credits: http://priceofoil.org/2009/09/16/money-for-nothing-and-your-climate-for-free/
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Keep your laws off my Belly.
The previous edition of the Activist which encapsulated views of
several youth on abortion sparked a heated debate on the local social media
scene and the blogosphere. Some comments questioned if 'pro-life-ers are anti
women'. Some even revealed shocking
statistics such as: 77% of all pro-life leaders are male, and 54% of women who
have had an abortion say they used contraception. As such, one stark reality
that all pro-life responses underscored was the self evident truth that unless
you've walked a mile in the shoes of someone who’s had or at least contemplated
abortion; your criticism is only as credible as straight people condemning gay
rights or the perfectly healthy denouncing euthanasia. Among the emails I received
was the one from Ranmali (26). Hers was a deeply personal insightful message.
This is her
story:
“I believed that abortion was something I will never consider going
through until it affected my life. But the morality and all the teaching aside,
I think people should be more careful about what they preach, especially when
they don’t have a clue about what goes on in a person’s mind when confronted
with a situation that is totally unexpected. Sure, a lot of people can say that
if one has sex, they should be aware of the consequences, but then, for those
who do take the necessary precautions against it, and still end up pregnant,
what does the world say to them? I was not ignorant of the consequences of
intercourse, nor was I not informed of contraceptives. I think I am one of
those examples of what people call “everything gone wrong”. I loved my
boyfriend, and I was ready to start a family with him. But I did not expect to
have a child till the moment I found out that I was pregnant. It came as a shock
to me. I was hit with another blow when I found that my boyfriend was cheating
on me. He was pro abortion from day two of us getting to know that I was
pregnant. On day one, he was happy thinking that he was going to become a
father. It was after some time later that I found out that he was cheating on
me. It kind of explained to me why he wanted to get rid of the child.
Nevertheless I was not convinced that I wanted to go through something illegal
nor did I want to kill my child. But sometimes we are faced with situations
where we do not have much choice. Do I raise a child alone and let society call
me a 'bad woman' and my child a bastard, or do I put an end to all this and go
through an abortion? I ended up keeping the child. This led to a lot of dilemmas
in life. I could never have done something illegal. And yet the options that
were available were not the safest either. I was told by many that certain
doctors would perform abortions, and was recommended certain hospitals as well.
But knew I could not face the world if something went wrong, nor could I
imagine how it would feel after the abortion. But what surprised me were my
mum’s sentiments on hearing that I was pregnant. She said that she would have
made sure I terminated the pregnancy had she known in advance. Sometimes
parents can surprise you, my mother certainly did. I never thought that they
would react to a pregnancy in that way, but I guess most of us judge things
wrong. If we take a closer look, I am sure that despite laws that prohibit abortion,
there would be many who would see things in a logical manner and act without a
shroud of imposed morality blocking their senses.”
If 77% of all anti-abortion leaders really are male: then 100% of
them will never get pregnant. As such, it
may be difficult for us men to relate to pregnancy and everything else it
entails: from the bulging belly and disapproving parents to ridicule from
distant relatives and pro-lifers shouting ‘murder’. After all, if you can't
trust a woman with a choice how can you trust her with a child?
Originally published on The Nation:
Originally published on The Nation:
Labels:
Abortion,
Senel Wanniarachchi,
Sri Lanka,
youth
Spare the child or swing the paddle
Corporal
Punishment perpetuates a cycle of violence. Perpetrators of Corporal Punishment
often tend to justify their action by reasoning that being subjected to
Corporal Punishment as children did not do them any harm. However, they are
oblivious to the stark reality that they themselves are inadvertently trapped
in a vicious cycle of violence. Adults resorting to corporal punishment,
teaches children that it is acceptable to use violence as a last resort. Wars are fought on this principle. However,
just as there is no such thing as a just war, inflicting of pain on a minor,
too, is unjustifiable.
Due to the vast differences in each
individual’s biological makeup, temperament, cognitive endurance, and
personality not every person possesses an equal level of resiliency. Corporal punishment has consistently been
found to lead to Increased aggressive and destructive behavior, increased
disruptive classroom behavior, vandalism, poor school achievement, poor
attention span, increased drop-out rate, school avoidance and school phobia,
low self-esteem, anxiety, somatic complaints, depression, suicide and
retaliation etc…
Punishing
children maybe a successful deterrent to wrongdoings, however, fear is not
interchangeable with understanding or realization. When a child refrains from
engaging in a wrongdoing because he or she may be punished, it is his/her fear
for punishment that keeps the wrongdoing at bay, not the self-realization of
the moral implications of his action. Real discipline is not based on force,
but grows from understanding, mutual respect and tolerance. Therefore, while
corporal punishment maybe a good deterrent it is questionable whether, it a
good teaching technique. Teachers should develop more effective creative,
positive, non-violent, approaches to school discipline.
Sometimes
corporal punishment becomes an outlet for adults’ pent-up frustrations, stress
and masochistic tendencies rather than a genuine attempt to educate children. Children
then are at the receiving end punishment simply decided by the mood of the
teacher.
Children, as all
human beings, are entitled to the right to respect for their human dignity and
physical integrity, corporal punishment is a clear breach of the same. Severe
Corporal punishment is simply unacceptable. While physical punishment may hurt
the child insensitive verbal abuse can also leave scars that last a lifetime.
There may also
be teachers that abuse their position of authority, gaining self-esteem through
the humiliation of minors. Recently, there was a report of a teacher that
allegedly forced a student to eat inedible produce. Such sadistic tendencies
must not be tolerated.
The
normalization of corporal punishment reinforces societal acceptance. It is
looked at, as an inevitable part of growing up, as opposed to a problem that
exists in society that needs to be addressed.
I am not opposed
to the very institution of punishment however, on a comparative basis; the deliberate,
repeated, violent and insensitive punishment is simply unacceptable.
Issues that matter : An old interview that went on the Sunday Times
Labels:
Best Delegate,
Hansini Munasinghe,
MUN,
Senel Wanniarachchi,
Sri Lanka,
sunday times,
VIMUN
Voices for Change: An ancient interview on the Colombo Spirit
November 1, 2011 (TCS) - It’s an unpleasant reality but human rights are violated on a frighteningly regular basis. Children are bullied, teenagers are ragged and adults are subject to domestic violence. This continues and is constantly swept under the rug – why? Because people are too afraid to speak out in their own defence.
The [Red] Movement is the voices of all these people, finally calling for a change.
While it’s widely known that it is ‘bad’ to steal and beat up people, this cause looks into the darker nooks and crannies, into issues that plague schools, homes and workplaces – bullying, abuse and domestic violence. The Movement, with a changing adjective according to the headline issue being addressed, was founded with the aim of promoting awareness among citizens of their human rights. They’re not addressing issues that make the front page every day but more sensitive, emotional situations that tend to be overlooked or ignored by society
It is of paramount importance that in today’s society, people – especially young children – know that these rights exist.
Sri Lanka is a country that’s seen war so up-close that people are almost accustomed to the violence. In comparison to the bombs and mass civilian deaths, an instance of bullying might seem insignificant. Quite on the contrary, this too has an adverse impact on society.
Founder of The Movement Senel Wanniarachchi states that the issues they’re aiming to bring to light are ones that people don’t talk about. “Situations like teenage suicide, bullying and domestic violence are issues conveniently avoided by society” he says.
There are a range of issues that The Movement plans to target. Bullying, ragging, teenage suicide and domestic violence are a few. Being that there are a significant amount of ragging-related deaths and suicides over the years, Wanniarachchi hopes to organize campaigns such as ‘Suicide Prevention Weeks’ as are commonly seen in Western countries.
“Society has set a range of stereotypes, what’s ‘cool’ and ‘uncool’ but we want to show kids that it’s alright to not conform to society’s expectations” Senel says. By collaborating with respected sports and society icons, they hope to project the ideology that it’s okay to break the ‘mold’. “We want to change the mindset of the people” he expressed, adding that they want to make society more sensitive to people with psychological conditions and other disorders that aren’t well understood.
The Movement is just getting off the ground and their main tool for spreading their message is the media. “It’s still a lot of mere ideas but at the end of the day, we want to get people talking” Senel says, awareness being their basic yet most powerful strategy at the moment.
Young, committed voices for change are what The Movement in looking for. Anyone interested in writing, graphics and helping the team get their word across can write to senel.wanniarachchi@gmail.com for more details.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Rio+20: the Future We Want
We are living in exceptional times. For climate change activists the last few decades have been ‘the best of times’ and ‘the worst of times’. While the world saw unprecedented efforts for environmental protection leading to many ongoing developments; our awareness on the need to take action and mitigate climate change has risen faster than our capacity to do so.
Severn Cullis-Suzuki, then just 12 years old, addressing the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro said “I have no hidden agenda; I’m fighting for my future.” We cannot afford failure for if we don’t act today, our tomorrows will be at stake.
What are Rio+20?
The Global Community will meet in Rio de Janeiro in June 2012 to define a plan for the future we want in terms of sustainable development. The 3 main objectives of the Rio+20 Conference are: securing renewed political commitment to sustainable development, assessing the progress and implementation gaps in meeting already agreed commitments, and addressing new and emerging challenges.
The preparation for Rio+20 is an on-going country-led process coordinated by the United Nations for over two years, including 3 rounds of Preparatory Committee Meetings, Intercessional Meetings and Informal Consultations. The resulting inputs were compiled to serve as a basis for the zero draft of the Rio+20 outcome document. At the Conference, world leaders, along with thousands of participants from governments, the private sector, NGOs and other groups, will come together to shape how we can reduce poverty, advance social equity and ensure environmental protection on an ever more crowded planet. It’s a chance to move away from business as usual, to act to end poverty, address environmental destruction and build a bridge to the future.
Why do we need Rio+20?
2012 is the first year to awaken to a world population of 7 billion, and by 2050 it is predicted that there will be as many as 9 billion earthlings. With considerable implications for sustainability, urbanisation, access to health services and youth empowerment, a world of 7 billion also offers a rare call for renewing global commitment to a healthy and sustainable world for all. Statistics show that one out of every five people – 1.4 billion – currently lives on $1.25 a day or less, that almost a billion people go to bed hungry every day and that more than a third of all known species will go extinct if climate change continues unchecked. Rio+20 provides an opportunity to think globally, so that we can all act locally to secure our common future.
At Home, the 2009 documentary by Yann Arthus-Bertrand questions “what’s important is not what’s gone, but what remains. We still have half the world’s forests, thousands of rivers, lakes and glaciers, and thousands of thriving species. We know that the solutions are there today. We all have the power to change. So what are we waiting for?” We can’t afford to wait any longer. If our actions at Rio+20 are too little, it will surely be too late.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
One Day on Earth- The World's Story is Yours to Tell
When the
UN convened the first Earth Summit
in Rio in 1992, technology played a minor role in the
task of setting global development
agendas. Twenty years later, the
situation is completely different. Digital and social media have proved that they have a potentially crucial role to play in sustainable global
development. On the
22nd of April which was the United
Nations designated International Mother
Earth Day, the United Nations
Information Center (UNIC) - Colombo in collaboration with the youth group “Youth for Greener Sri Lanka
Platform”, organized a workshop on “using digital and social media to address
sustainable development”. The workshops highlighted how today, modern
technology and social media have the
power to transform the world and use
technology as a force.
Youth as a powerful tool
Attending Earth Day celebrations, the Secretary to the
Ministry of Environment said that the youth are a powerful tool in creating
awareness on risk issues and that the Ministry believes in mobilizing the youth
in these efforts. UNIC, Colombo, supported by UNDP Energy & Environment,
promotes Youth efforts in “National Road to Rio+20 campaigns in Sri Lanka.
One Day on Earth
Following the
successful conclusion of the
workshop, the documentary film “One
Day on the Earth” was screened
followed by the music video, ‘Make
it Green Again’. This was a historic feat as the
film was screened in over 160 countries around the
world, on the same day. One Day on
Earth is a grassroots film project that, once a year, captures the human experience in every country on earth on the same day. This feature-length documentary film
premiers on Earth Day, April 22, 2012 and -- screened in over 160 countries
around the world. It showcases the work of many UN partners and over 19,000
volunteer filmmakers– novice and professional –and sets a world record: the first movie to feature footage from every
country in the world on the same day. The movie starts with the birth of a newborn in UK and encapsulates rare
footage from all over the world
giving a unique opportunity to see our world and the
issues we face through a new lens. The footage links the
crises, which confront the world
today; from increasing population, consumption, waste production, environmental
degradation and water shortage faced every day.
The documentary visualizes diminishing resources and the message that it's is, after all a shared planet.
(The video is available for public distribution at UNIC. Tel: 2580791).
Rio+20
The Global Community will meet in
Rio de Janeiro in June 2012 to define a plan for the
“ future we want “ in
terms of sustainable development. Rio+20 is a part of a process of global
awareness that led to calls for action. The 3 main objectives of the Rio+20 Conference are: securing renewed
political commitment to sustainable development, assessing the progress and implementation gaps in meeting
already agreed commitments, and addressing new and emerging challenges. The
ocean is one of seven critical issues identified, with jobs, energy, cities,
food, water, and disasters.
The preparation for Rio+20 is an
on-going country-led process coordinated by the
United Nations over two years, including 3 rounds of Preparatory Committee
Meetings, Intercessional Meetings and ‘Informal-informal’ Consultations. The
resulting inputs were compiled to serve as a basis for the
zero draft of the Rio+20 outcome
document.
We cannot afford failure. The
security and sustainability of life on Earth depends on our success. As Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said, “Rio+20
is a once-in-a generation opportunity that all of us must seize, driving at the interrelations such that solutions to one
problem translate into progress on all.”.
If our actions at Rio+20 are too little, it will surely be too late.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)